Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Carter v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

Carter v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 14, 2007 · Per Curiam
955 So. 2d 665; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7293; 2007 WL 1385962 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Carter v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

955 So.2d 665 (2007)

Rickey J. CARTER, Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 1D06-4384.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 14, 2007.

Rickey J. Carter, pro se, Appellant.

Kim M. Fluharty, General Counsel, and Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court erred by construing appellant's petition for writ of habeas corpus as a petition for writ of mandamus and dismissing it as successive. The parole-revocation issue is properly raised by petition for writ of habeas corpus, and the issue has not been addressed on the merits in either the circuit court or in this court. We reverse and remand with directions to the circuit court to transfer the petition to the county where appellant is incarcerated. Because there are no fees permitted in a habeas proceeding, imposition of a lien against appellant's inmate account was also error.

*666 REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.