Benedetto v. State
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- DANNY R. ENNIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- WILLIAM R. JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- Johnson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
- Johnson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Anthony K. BENEDETTO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*110 Anthony K. Benedetto, Lake City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Appellant's habitual violent felony offender (HVFO) sentence was not affected by the amendments of Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which were found unconstitutional in State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1999). Although appellant committed his offense within the window period established by Thompson, the trial court could have imposed the HVFO sentence in this case under the prior version of the statute without the amendments. Johnson v. State, 763 So.2d 283 (Fla. 2000); Tiger v. State, 764 So.2d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
POLEN, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.