Hurst v. Hurst
Hurst v. Hurst
973 So. 2d 1164; 2007 WL 1518304
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hurst v. Hurst
Opinion
Jann Kimberly HURST, n/k/a Jann Kimberly Papiernik, Appellant,
v.
Barry Lee HURST, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Steven P. Combs of Smith Green & Combs, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
A. Russell Smith, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of February 1, 2007, the Court has determined that because the Order Regarding Former Wife's Motion for Clarification merely reiterates provisions contained within the previously entered Consent Final Judgment, the order on appeal is not an appealable order. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.