Matyjasik v. State
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Charles v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
- Shea v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
- Fleming v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Richard MATYJASIK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard Matyjasik, Immokalee, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Richard Matyjasik appeals from an order that summarily denied his motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Fla. R.Crim. P. (2007). The circuit court did not find that appellant's claim was facially insufficient, nor did it attach records which conclusively refuted the claim. See Sheffield v. State, 903 So.2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) citing (Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 1993)). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.
SHAHOOD, C.J., FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.