Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Seeber v. State

Seeber v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 23, 2007 · Per Curiam
956 So. 2d 1240; 2007 WL 1486120 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Seeber v. State

Opinion

956 So.2d 1240 (2007)

Thomas SEEBER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D07-1624.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 23, 2007.

Arthur B. Brandt of Brandt & Gufford, Stuart, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed, without reference to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), a motion simply titled "Motion to Modify Sentence." The trial court treated the motion as a rule 3.800(c) motion and, after the sixty-day jurisdictional window expired, denied the motion for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal as a non-appealable order. See State v. Woodard, 866 So.2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Grosse v. State, 511 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 519 So.2d 987 (Fla. 1988).

GUNTHER, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑