Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Bak v. Bak

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 10, 2007 · Gross, Polen, Warner

947 So. 2d 621; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 190; 2007 WL 57266 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

Knox v. PPC, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The former husband appeals from an order of contempt. He has failed to present a transcript of proceedings, and thus the appropriateness of the sanctions in the order cannot be addressed, nor can the issue raised with respect to the admissibility of evidence. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). With respect to his claim that the order requires immediate incarceration upon future non-compliance, the order of contempt contains no such mandatory language. All the trial judge did was express *622a hope that a successor judge would incarcerate the appellant in the event that he were subsequently found to have violated the terms of the final judgment.

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.