Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. Romano

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. Romano
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 9, 2007 · Lewis, Thomas, Wolf
948 So. 2d 815; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 103; 2007 WL 43555 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. Romano

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the employer/carrier’s (E/C) response to this court’s order to show cause dated December 4, 2006, the court has determined that the order on appeal is not a reviewable adverse order. See Crown Pontiac, Inc. v. Bell, 547 So.2d 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). If, in the future, claimant files another petition for benefits seeking benefits from the E/C, the E/C may assert their affirmative defense of misrepresentation at that time.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.