Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. Romano
Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. Romano
948 So. 2d 815; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 103; 2007 WL 43555
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles/Division of Risk Management v. Romano
Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration of the employer/carrier’s (E/C) response to this court’s order to show cause dated December 4, 2006, the court has determined that the order on appeal is not a reviewable adverse order. See Crown Pontiac, Inc. v. Bell, 547 So.2d 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). If, in the future, claimant files another petition for benefits seeking benefits from the E/C, the E/C may assert their affirmative defense of misrepresentation at that time.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.