Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

B.W. v. State

B.W. v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 20, 2007 · Browning, Padovano, Webster
948 So. 2d 974; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2311; 2007 WL 505289 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

B.W. v. State

Concurring Opinion

BROWNING, C.J.,

concurring opinion.

I concur with the majority opinion, because I am bound by the precedents it cites. However, I conclude that these precedents were incorrectly decided.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.- See, e.g., Padmore v. State, 743 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Brookins v. State, 704 So.2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur. BROWNING, C.J., concurs with written opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑