Pifer v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal March 2, 2007

Pifer v. State, 951 So. 2d 40 (2007)

2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3145; 2007 WL 624982

Altenbernd, Northcutt, Villanti

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur. ALTENBERND, J., Concurs with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge,

Concurring.

I concur in the affirmance of the eighteen judgments and seventeen sentences on appeal in this case. An Anders1 brief was filed in this case, and we have located no reversible error. The trial judge, however, should be advised that no probation order was ever rendered in case number 2005-CF-2488, even though drug probation was the announced sentence. It appears to be the only case in which probation was imposed. Thus, unless an order is rendered, it is doubtful that Mr. Pifer will actually be placed on probation when his prison sentence is completed.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Reference

Full Case Name: Chad PIFER v. STATE of Florida
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published