Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Pifer v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 2, 2007 · Altenbernd, Northcutt, Villanti

951 So. 2d 40; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3145; 2007 WL 624982 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Pifer v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
James W. Windham Builders, Inc. v. Overloop (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur. ALTENBERND, J., Concurs with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

ALTENBERND, Judge,

Concurring.

I concur in the affirmance of the eighteen judgments and seventeen sentences on appeal in this case. An Anders1 brief was filed in this case, and we have located no reversible error. The trial judge, however, should be advised that no probation order was ever rendered in case number 2005-CF-2488, even though drug probation was the announced sentence. It appears to be the only case in which probation was imposed. Thus, unless an order is rendered, it is doubtful that Mr. Pifer will actually be placed on probation when his prison sentence is completed.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.