Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Tole v. State

Tole v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 4, 2007 · Barfield, Kahn, Padovano
953 So. 2d 689; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4894; 2007 WL 980732 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Tole v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the appellant’s first claim without further discussion. Because the appellant’s second claim is facially sufficient, and because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute the appellant’s claim, we reverse and remand to the trial court to attach portions of the record which conclusively refute the appellant’s claim, to hold an evidentiary hearing, or to grant the relief requested. See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1996); Rackley v. State, 571 So.2d 533, 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.