Dipasquale v. Maroone Ford, LLC
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, etc v. CHARLES RICHARD STEVENS a/k/a CHARLES R. STEVENS (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
- Velazquez v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Tillman v. State, 471 So.2d 32, 35 (Fla. 1985) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court ... the specific legal argument ... to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.”); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla. 1982) (“in order for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as legal ground for the objection, exception, or motion below.”).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.