Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Taylor v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 18, 2007 · Coneur, Klein, Shahóod, Stevenson

954 So. 2d 695; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5610; 2007 WL 1136091 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Rivera v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was -convicted of robbery with a firearm and argues, in this direct appeal, that his trial counsel was ineffective for not objecting to an officer and the victim giving opinion testimony. The two witnesses, however, did not give the type of opinion testimony which might be inadmissible. They were merely testifying as to how certain they were in their identification of appellant as the person who had committed the crime. The testimony was accordingly admissible.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, C.J., KLEIN and SHAHÓOD, JJ.,„coneur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.