Adams v. Zarate
Adams v. Zarate
955 So. 2d 49; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4429; 2007 WL 837189
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Adams v. Zarate
Opinion of the Court
Danny Lee Adams, (“former husband”), appeals the trial court’s order approving the general master’s report and income deduction order awarding Debora Jo Za-rate, (“former wife”), child support payments. The former husband raises numerous points on appeal, but has failed to present a transcript of the proceedings or prepare a factual statement of the proceedings. Thus, the record presented is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. See Schmitt v. Maile, 946 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Mayfield v. Mayfield, 929 So.2d 671 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.