Priester v. State
Priester v. State
955 So. 2d 644; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6613; 2007 WL 1261484
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Priester v. State
Opinion of the Court
The order denying Appellant’s emergency motions for reclarification of sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to his right to exhaust all administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections. If the department fails to implement the earlier orders clarifying and amending his sentences, he may then seek mandamus relief against the Department of Corrections in the circuit court. See Davis v. State, 943 So.2d 975 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Smith v. State, 785 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.