Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Perry v. State

Perry v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 9, 2007 · Gross, Hazouri, Stone
955 So. 2d 1214; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7108; 2007 WL 1342538 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Perry v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s postconviction relief claim that prior to entering Ms plea, his counsel misadvised him as to the length of a potential sentence, is conclusively refuted by the thorough and detailed plea conference conducted by the trial court. See Scheele v. State, 953 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), reh’g granted No. 4D06-38 (Fla. 4th DCA May 9, 2007) (observing that “[w]hat is said and done at a plea conference carries consequences”).

Affirmed.

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.