Williams v. State
Williams v. State
963 So. 2d 928; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13661; 2007 WL 2428588
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Williams v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence, apparently desiring additional jail credit. However, his motion alleged that the court gave credit for 155 days, and he does not allege that he was entitled to more than that. The trial court correctly denied the motion.
We affirm. If appellant’s real claim is that the Department of Corrections has not properly given him credit, then he must first pursue administrative remedies through the Department of Corrections.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.