Riffe v. State
Riffe v. State
966 So. 2d 1020; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16466; 2007 WL 3033406
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Riffe v. State
Opinion of the Court
Steven Riffe appeals from an order denying his rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail credit. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). The State concedes that because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record to support denial of Riffe’s motion, we must reverse. See, e.g., Stewart v. State, 920 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (noting that when the trial court denies a 3.800 motion as successive, it “is required to attach the relevant portions of the record which demonstrate that the motion is successive.”).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.