James v. State
James v. State
969 So. 2d 1115; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17720; 2007 WL 3274923
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
James v. State
Opinion of the Court
The summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, but without prejudice to appellant seeking relief through administrative remedies or a proper, timely rule 3.850 motion. See Canty v. State, 884 So.2d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.