Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Dirk v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 30, 2007 · Evander, Sawaya, Torpy

969 So. 2d 1170; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18799; 32 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2853 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Dirk v. State (Fla. 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This court has previously held that the United States Supreme Court decisions in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 *1171S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) do not apply retroactively in those cases in which the convictions became final prior to the Apprendi decision, even though resentencing occurred post-Apprendi See Rouse v. State, 965 So.2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Langford v. State, 929 So.2d 598 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). As we did in Langford, we certify conflict with Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.