Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2007

Muram v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 7, 2007 · Green, Rothenberg, Suarez

970 So. 2d 394; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17721; 2007 WL 3274429 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

William Sims v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2025)
Cuesta v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Defendant’s motion for postconviction relief. The issue of whether or not the defendant is entitled to DNA testing has previously been addressed by this Court. See Muram, v. State, 950 So.2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). We also affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s request for a free trial transcript. See Roesch v. State, 633 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1993) (indigent inmates are not entitled to records free-of-charge); Yanke v. State, 588 So.2d 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (no *395right to free transcript for preparation of postconviction motion).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.