Urbay v. State
Urbay v. State
971 So. 2d 836; 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16700; 2007 WL 3085392
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Urbay v. State
Opinion of the Court
Nestor Urbay, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm because the movant failed to state a meritorious basis for relief. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Urbay’s claims for retroactive application of post-sentencing decisions fail as a matter of law because he was duly sentenced (after pleading guilty) according to the law as it existed when he committed the crimes. See State v. Miranda, 793 So.2d 1042, 1044 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.