Glindmeier v. Kaebel Wholesales & Fluorescent Maintenance
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Pendergrass (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Lutz Frank GLINDMEIER, Appellant,
v.
KAEBEL WHOLESALES & FLUORESCENT MAINTENANCE, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*519 Maurice Graham, Oakland, for Appellant.
Geoffrey C. Curreri, Plantation, H. George Kagan, Miller, Kagan, Rodriguez, & Silver, P.L., West Palm Beach, and Stephanie A. Robinson, Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow, & Schefer, P.A., Hollywood, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of Appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, entered November 17, 2008, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Troche v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc., 954 So.2d 685, 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (noting if notice of appeal is not timely filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal); see also Caldwell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 980 So.2d 1226, 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (noting a motion for rehearing in a workers' compensation case does not toll the time for filing an appeal); Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Q-6.122(3) (providing "a motion for re-hearing does not toll the time within which an order becomes final or an appeal may be filed").
WEBSTER, DAVIS, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.