Miele v. State
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Langford v. Masco (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Thomas L. MIELE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Thomas L. Miele appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm without discussion the trial court's denial of Miele's second claim. However, we reverse the trial court's summary denial of Miele's claims one and three. Although we agree that the claims are facially insufficient, under Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2007), Miele should have been given the opportunity to amend the insufficient claims.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.
PLEUS, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.