Oliphant v. State
Oliphant v. State
983 So. 2d 16; 2008 WL 876653
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Oliphant v. State
Opinion
Rashad S. OLIPHANT, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida or John Rutherford, Sheriff, Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*17 Rashad S. Oliphant, pro se, Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition is denied as moot.
PADOVANO, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.