Nix v. State
Nix v. State
975 So. 2d 576; 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 2179; 2008 WL 441658
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Nix v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence, but without prejudice to raising the issue in a timely, non-successive rule 8.850 motion. See generally Tennant v. State, 827 So.2d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)..
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.