1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky

Florida District Courts of Appeal
1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky, 975 So. 2d 1233 (2008)
2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454; 2008 WL 649040
Cope, Green, Wells

1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiffs fifth amended complaint, with prejudice, for failure to state a cause of action. We reverse.

“A legal malpractice action has three elements: 1) the attorney’s employment; 2) the attorney’s neglect of a reasonable duty; and 3) the attorney’s negligence as the proximate cause of loss to the client.” Law Ofc. of David J. Stern, P.A. v. Sec. Nat’l Servicing Corp., 969 So.2d 962, 966 (Fla. 2007). The complaint and attached exhibits properly alleged these elements. As such, the dismissal was in error. Accordingly, we remand with instructions that plaintiffs cause be reinstated.

Reversed and remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
1611 EUCLID AVENUE, INC. v. RITTER, RITTER & ZARETSKY, a limited liability partnership for profit, and Louis Zaretsky, Esq., and Mark Lynn, Esq.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published