1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky
1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky
975 So. 2d 1233; 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3454; 2008 WL 649040
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiffs fifth amended complaint, with prejudice, for failure to state a cause of action. We reverse.
“A legal malpractice action has three elements: 1) the attorney’s employment; 2) the attorney’s neglect of a reasonable duty; and 3) the attorney’s negligence as the proximate cause of loss to the client.” Law Ofc. of David J. Stern, P.A. v. Sec. Nat’l Servicing Corp., 969 So.2d 962, 966 (Fla. 2007). The complaint and attached exhibits properly alleged these elements. As such, the dismissal was in error. Accordingly, we remand with instructions that plaintiffs cause be reinstated.
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.