Racoma v. Hannans
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Emerald Pointe Prop. v. Commercial Const. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Ireneo Racoma, Jr., M.D., and Franklin, Favata & Hulls, M.D.’s, P.A., appeal from the order granting Steffan L. Hannans a new trial after a jury rendered a verdict in favor of Dr. Racoma in an action for medical malpractice. We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a new trial, and accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to reinstate the jury’s verdict. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (2005) (stating that “[n]o judgment shall be set aside or reversed, or new trial granted by any court of the state in any cause ... unless in the opinion of the court ... after an examination of the entire case it shall appear that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.”).
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.