Ramos v. State
Ramos v. State
979 So. 2d 359; 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5257; 2008 WL 977354
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ramos v. State
Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN, J.
We are bound to reverse and remand the appealed order summarily denying claims three and five of Appellant’s Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion pursuant to the high court’s recent decision in Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2007). Under Spera, Appellant is entitled to an opportunity to replead these two claims, which the
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ„ concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.