Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2008

A.M.W. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 2, 2008 · Cohen, Griffin, Monaco

980 So. 2d 1219; 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6176 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

AMW v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Supreme Court reinstated this appeal for reconsideration in light of *1220Kelso v. State, 961 So.2d 277 (Fla. 2007). Ají opinion of this court was previously issued on June 30, 2006, A.M.W. v. State, 934 So.2d 564 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). The majority of the opinion is unaffected by Kelso; however, based upon that decision this court’s earlier disposition of A.M.W.’s double jeopardy claim as it related to convictions for both theft of a firearm and grand theft for other items is withdrawn, and we substitute the following language in its stead.

A.M.W. argues that he may not be convicted of both grand theft of a firearm and third-degree grand theft of other items when both charges arise from the same burglary. This issue was resolved by the supreme court adverse to A.M.W.’s position in Kelso, 961 So.2d 277.

AM.W.’s adjudication for grand theft of a firearm is AFFIRMED. The remaining counts are unaffected by this decision and remain as set forth in this court’s earlier opinion.

GRIFFIN, MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.