Dueno v. State
Dueno v. State
988 So. 2d 1192; 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12172; 2008 WL 3286168
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dueno v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant filed an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the record did not reveal reversible error, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. Although the written judgment reflects that appellant was convicted of a life felony, the offense is a first-degree felony. The trial court is directed to correct the judgment accordingly.
AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.