Trevil v. State
Trevil v. State
992 So. 2d 346; 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15112; 2008 WL 4414214
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Miller v. Miller (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Because we find that appellant did not apprise the trial court of the potential discovery violation in a timely manner, we affirm. See Cuciak v. State, 410 So.2d 916, 918 (Fla. 1982) (“The probationer has the burden of bringing the violation to the court’s attention in a timely manner.”).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.