Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2009

Keitt v. State

Keitt v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 19, 2009 · Ciklin, Damoorgian, Levine
16 So. 3d 261; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11597; 2009 WL 2517053 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Keitt v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ingemar Keitt challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in which he alleges that he did not have the requisite predicate offenses to support his sentencing enhancement. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Though the order denying relief referenced a state’s response, the state advises that it had not been ordered to respond to the rule 3.800 motion. Rather, it responded to a rule 3.850 motion that had been pending as well.

Reversed and remanded.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.