Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2009

Saldana v. State

Saldana v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 31, 2009 · Monaco, Griffin, Orfinger
17 So. 3d 338; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10599; 2009 WL 2338046 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Saldana v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appealed order. Moreover, after having painstakingly collected *339 and reviewed this appellant’s series of post-conviction filings and appeals, which are remarkable for their incoherence, inaccuracy and frivolousness, we deem it appropriate to order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999), that appellant Saldana show cause within ten days from the date of this opinion why he should not be barred from any further pro se filings in this court concerning his 1992 and 1999 convictions.

MONACO, C.J., GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.