Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2009

Moncrieffe v. State

Moncrieffe v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 2, 2009 · No. 4D07-4717 · Levine, Stevenson
17 So. 3d 850; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12816; 2009 WL 2762634 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Moncrieffe v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for a violation of probation based on his arrest on new charges. He argues the court erred in finding that he violated his probation and in failing to enter a written order of revocation. We find no error in the court’s finding that the defendant violated his probation, but we do find error in the trial court’s failure “to enter a written order specifying the specific condition of probation that [the defendant] violated....” Peterson v. State, 962 So.2d 367, 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We therefore reverse and remand the case to the trial court for entry of a written order of revocation.

Reversed in parí and remanded.

STEVENSON, MAY and LEVINE, JJ„ concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.