Crawford v. State
Crawford v. State
12 So. 3d 919; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9513; 2009 WL 2004950
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Crawford v. State
Opinion
In light of the insufficiency of the evidence presented by the prosecution to prove the commission of the two counts of grand theft of which the appellant was convicted, these convictions are reversed and this case is remanded to the trial court with directions that the appellant be discharged. See Martin v. State, 379 So.2d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA1980).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.