King v. State
King v. State
3 So. 3d 1270; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3614; 2009 WL 559951
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
King v. State
Opinion
The trial court’s order summarily denying King’s Rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail time credit is affirmed without prejudice to King’s right to file a facially sufficient Rule 3.800(a) motion. See Hinlcel v. State, 937 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA2006).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.