Shazer v. State
Shazer v. State
3 So. 3d 453; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1956; 2009 WL 605366
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- McKinney v. State (Fla. 2011)
- McKinney v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The State agrees that appellant’s dual convictions for robbery with a deadly weapon and grand theft violate his double jeopardy rights because the same property formed the basis for both convictions. See Ingram v. State, 928 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s conviction and sentence for grand theft and remand with directions to the trial court to vacate the same.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.