HOARDES v. State
HOARDES v. State
1 So. 3d 377; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 667; 2009 WL 211905
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
HOARDES v. State
Opinion
Appellant correctly asserts that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis as a lesser included offense of the sale of cannabis. See State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939, 941 (Fla. 1991). We, therefore, reverse appellant’s conviction as to count I. In all other respects, we affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.