Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2009

Manley v. Tedesco

Manley v. Tedesco
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 18, 2009 · Whatley, Larose, James
1 So. 3d 1284; 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 379; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1253; 2009 WL 386912 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Manley v. Tedesco

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Manley appeals an order entered by the trial court establishing an arrearage amount of $45,877.28. We reverse. We also note that other motions were heard which were not noticed for hearing.

The hearing on the amount of the child support arrearage was inadequate for a number of reasons. The most obvious was the fact that the records of the Department of Revenue (DOR) potentially reflected a different arrearage amount from that testified to by Tedesco.

*1285 The continuance requested by Manley to allow a DOR representative to testify should have been granted.

We reverse and remand for a new hearing to determine the proper child support arrearage as due on November 20, 2007, and to enter an order that is appropriate based on that calculation.

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY, and LaROSE JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., Associate Senior Judge, Concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.