FREEBARIN v. State
FREEBARIN v. State
23 So. 3d 170; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15846; 2009 WL 3349546
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
FREEBARIN v. State
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s revocation of his probation. We affirm the revocation of probation; however, remand is required for entry of an order specifying the conditions which Appellant was determined to have violated. *171 See Jones v. State, 638 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.