Comas v. State
Comas v. State
15 So. 3d 933; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11231; 2009 WL 2448115
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Comas v. State
Opinion
The appellant’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence, but reverse and remand for correction of a scrivener’s error.
The jury found the appellant guilty of section 810.02(3)(a), Florida Statutes, burglary of a dwelling. The trial court properly pronounced judgment, but the written judgment indicates that the appellant was *934 convicted of section 810.02(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court is therefore directed to conform the written judgment to its oral pronouncement.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.