Carter v. State
Carter v. State
32 So. 3d 67; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9353; 2009 WL 1940793
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Carter v. State
Opinion
Michael Andrew Carter appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon. We affirm. Mr. Carter correctly notes, however, that the written judgment mistakenly reflects a conviction for robbery with a firearm or deadly weapon instead of robbery with a weapon. See § 812.13(2)(a), (b), Fla. Stat. (2006). As the State concedes, remand is necessary to correct this scrivener’s error. See Flesner v. State, 890 So.2d 331, 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Affirmed, but remanded for correction of scrivener’s error.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.