Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2009

Cramer v. State

Cramer v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 27, 2009 · Monaco, Orfinger, Palmer
5 So. 3d 790; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2669; 2009 WL 790157 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cramer v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Thomas L. Cramer’s motion to correct sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In reviewing the sentencing documents, we discovered a scrivener’s error in the judgment of Cramer’s Case No. 99-2987. Although the transcript of the sentencing hearing clearly indicates that the sentence in Case No. 99-2987 was to be served consecutively to the other sentences imposed at the same time, the written judgment fails to reflect that fact. On remand, a corrected sentencing document *791 shall be prepared and a copy forwarded to the Department of Corrections.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.