Russell v. State
Russell v. State
6 So. 3d 114; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3204; 2009 WL 996843
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Russell v. State
Opinion
We affirm without comment Jeffrey Russell’s convictions following his no contest plea to several sexual offenses involving minors. But as properly conceded by the State, the probation imposed for counts three and four was not orally pronounced by the court at sentencing. Accordingly, we reverse and remand solely for the purpose of striking the probation on those two counts. See Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla. 2003) (holding that court’s oral pronouncement of sentence controls over discrepancy in written sentence).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.