Green v. State
Green v. State
Opinion
The appellant has filed a rule 3.800(a) motion asserting that his 30-year sentence for a second-degree felony is illegal. The trial court denied the claim on the basis that the appellant raised the identical claim numerous times in the past. However, none of the attachments provided by the trial court refute the appellant’s specific claim raised in the instant motion, or even demonstrate that this claim has previously been addressed on the merits.
We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to attach record evidence that either establishes that this claim is successive or that conclusively refutes the appellant’s entitlement to relief, or to grant the appellant the relief he seeks. See Byers v. State, 916 So.2d 923 (Fla. 1st DCA2005).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.