Matos v. State
Matos v. State
13 So. 3d 543; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9112; 2009 WL 1940497
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Matos v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the trial court’s order summarily denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. On remand, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach documents to its order conclusively refuting the appellant’s motion.
Concurring in Part
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Reversal should be only on the issue that defense counsel’s failure to prepare or investigate the fingerprint evidence rendered the plea involuntary.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.