Jomolla v. State
Jomolla v. State
19 So. 3d 415; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13933; 2009 WL 2949306
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Jomolla v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Reyes v. State, 920 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (holding that where results would not have been different but for counsel’s error, the defendant has not proven prejudice as required under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)); see also Jomolla v. State, 990 So.2d 1234, 1238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (finding that the State did not argue the erroneous theory or rely upon it in the prosecution’s case).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.