Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2009

S.D.J. v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 6, 2009 · Jacobus, Lawson, Monaco

21 So. 3d 140; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16552; 2009 WL 3672089 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

FW v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
F.W. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on a juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudication of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

MONACO, C.J., LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.