Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2009

Goldman v. State

Goldman v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 22, 2009 · Cortinas, Salter, Shepherd
8 So. 3d 473; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410; 2009 WL 1066108 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Goldman v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); see also State v. Rodriguez, 990 So.2d 600, 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“[Neither the trial court nor counsel is required to forewarn a defendant about every conceivable collateral consequence of a plea to criminal charges.”).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.