Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2010

MARRUGO v. State

MARRUGO v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 21, 2010 · Shepherd, Rothenberg, Lagoa
34 So. 3d 138; 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5274; 2010 WL 1565215 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

MARRUGO v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This Court hereby affirms the trial court’s order denying Defendant’s motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, but does so without prejudice to the filing of an amended motion properly attaching the transcript of the sentencing proceedings in this matter. See Williams v. State, 957 So.2d 600, 604 (Fla. 2007) (“[T]he burden remains with the petitioner to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record. If the sentencing transcript is neither in the file nor attached to the motion, the motion should be denied without prejudice to the filing of an amended motion properly attaching the sentencing transcript”).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.